CA LEA data on MOE reduction and CEIS use

July 6th, 2011

IDEA Money Watch has obtained the information submitted by the California Dept. of Education to the U.S. Dept. of Education regarding reductions to local spending (maintenance of effort or MOE) and use of federal IDEA funds for Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) for each school district for the 2009 fiscal year. Get California information here. (PDF, 98 pgs.)

Summary of California Data regarding reductions to local spending
on special education (MOE) and use of federal IDEA funds for
Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) in 2009.

““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““`

There are 984 Total LEAs in the State of California. The state served 601,645 students with disabilities ages 6-21 in 2009.

  • 981 or 99.69% of the 984 LEAs were eligible to reduce spending
  • 483 (49.2%) out of 981 took a reduction in local spending on special education (MOE)
  • 189 (19%) out of the 981 took 100% of their allowable reductions (50% of increase in federal funds for 2009 vs. 2008)
  • 498 (50.6%) out of the 984 took NO reduction.
  • Total reductions taken total $335,816,713* or $558 for every student served in the state. (NOTE: LEAs are not required to restore these reductions when federal funds decrease.) *LA UNIFIED accounts for $73.6 million of this amount, or 22%. This figure does not include the following LEAs due to apparent discrepancies in the data provided by the California Department of Education: BELLEVIEW ELEMENTARY, SAN BENITO COUNTY SCHOOLS, SUMMERVILLE ELEMENTARY, COLUMBIA UNION
  • 17 out of 984 or 1.7% of the LEAs were required to use 15% of funds for Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) due to a finding by the state of inappropriate disproportionality in special education. Funds required to reserve were $17,985,170
  • 11 out of 984 or 1.1% of the LEAs voluntarily used up to 15% of funds for Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) Funds  voluntarily reserved $810,246.00
  • The total amount of CEIS reserved statewide was $18,795,416

Compiled from data furnished by the California Department of Education: July 2011

San Diego issues hundreds of layoff notices

May 12th, 2011

Unified formalizes layoff notices

Officials still hope funding will come through to restore the positions

By Maureen Magee

Tuesday, May 10, 2011 at 8:42 p.m.

The San Diego school board on Tuesday formally authorized hundreds of layoff notices that were issued to teachers in March.

With trustee Kevin Beiser casting the only opposing vote, the board issued layoff notices to more than 750 teachers to help offset a projected $114 million deficit to the San Diego Unified School District’s $1.04 billion operating budget for the 2011-12 year. Trustees rescinded 44 teacher layoff notices that were determined to have been issued in error. The board has also issued layoff notices to 1,550 nonteaching employees.

Full story available here.

Advocates challenge cuts in mental health program

October 27th, 2010

thumbs upThumbs Up for California advocates! On October 21, 2010, mental health and disability rights advocates filed a class-action lawsuit alleging that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) violated the federal rights of more than 20,000 special education students when he used line-item vetoes to eliminate a $133 million mental health program, the AP/San Jose Mercury News reports.

Background

For the past 25 years, county mental health departments administered a program that provided special education students with:

  • Case management;
  • Crisis counseling;
  • Medication management; and
  • Residential placement (Hoag, AP/San Jose Mercury News, 10/23).

On Oct. 8, Schwarzenegger signed a budget package and used line-item vetoes to cut state spending on the program by shifting responsibility for the mental health services from counties to school districts (Kelly, Santa Cruz Sentinel, 10/24).

The governor’s office has said that the line-item veto was both necessary and legal. The administration has not indicated whether the mental health services now will be funded by school districts or other entities.

>> More information on A.C. et al v. Schwarzenegger, concerning veto of mental health services for special education students (known as AB 3632 mandate), is available here.

IDEA Money Watch comments: While these cutbacks aren’t occurring within the state’s education budget, the effect on students with disabilities is the same, begging the question “should CA DOE need to request a waiver from USED for approval to reduce its state financial support to local school district?”

SEPTEMBER 2010 :: California IDEA Recovery Act spending at 60% – $733 million spent

October 8th, 2010

According to spending reports released by the U.S. Dept. of Education, CALIFORNIA has obligated 60% of its IDEA Part B Recovery funds, or $733,594,842 as of September 30, 2010. The national average is 50%. Spending details by local school district are available at EdMoney.org.

Current spending reports are always available here. All IDEA Recovery Act funds must be obligated by September 30, 2011.

California IDEA ARRA spending at 49%

September 4th, 2010

According to spending reports released by the U.S. Dept. of Education, California has obligated 49% – or $606,482,659 – of its IDEA Part B Recovery Act funds as of August 27, 2010. 

See information on IDEA Recovery Act spending for selected CA districts.

IDEA Recovery Act spending for selected CA districts

September 4th, 2010

From the GAO report, States Could Provide More Information on Education Programs to Enhance the Public’s Understanding of Fund Use, released July, 2010, the following information was collected via a GAO survey between March and April 2010 and through follow-up communications:

Menifee Union Elementary
Menifee, CA 92584
Award amount: $3,040,489

Menifee Union Elementary reported that it used its Recovery Act IDEA award to integrate more special education pupils into the regular curriculum. These funds supported 11 schools and 811 pupils. Specifically, the funds were used to retain staff and provide professional development for classroom management and instructional delivery to pupils. As a result of the IDEA funds, officials reported that the district was able to save 50 positions and improve learning opportunities for students. They indicated that their Recovery Act IDEA award activities were less than 50 percent completed.

Oxnard Elementary
Oxnard, CA 93030
Award amount: $2,773,322

Oxnard Elementary reported that it used its Recovery Act IDEA award to start up a cochlear implant classroom in the district, which required special acoustics, and furniture and included the hiring and training of a teacher. These funds served three students in the district and approximately six more from neighboring districts. In particular, the funds were used to create a classroom, train staff, and buy supplies. As a result of these IDEA funds, officials reported that the district was able to provide services locally at a much reduced cost rather than sending students to an institute in Los Angeles. They also said that the district can now serve students in their own district as well as students in surrounding districts. The cochlear implant classroom will open in the 2010-2011 school year. Officials indicated that their Recovery Act IDEA award activities were less than 50 percent completed.

Sacramento City Unified
Sacramento, CA 95824
Award amount: $10,069,615

Sacramento City Unified reported that it used its Recovery Act IDEA award to retain instructional staff, provide professional development for special education staff and upgrade facilities to include an occupational therapy clinic at a school that serves a large number of special education students.. These funds served approximately 2,000 students with special needs in the district. Specifically, the funds were used to retain special education staff, provide professional development for instructional staff, and to make school facility upgrades so that students could receive occupational therapy services while at school rather than being bussed to another location. As a result of these IDEA funds, officials reported that the district was able to increase academic proficiency in California Standards Tests (CST) and retain approximately 10 instructional positions. In addition, the facility update allowed students with special needs to receive services during their school day, thereby reducing disruptions to their education. They indicated that their Recovery Act IDEA award activities were less than 50 percent completed.

San Dieguito Union High
Encinitas, CA 92024
Award amount: $1,431,581

San Dieguito Union High School District officials reported that it used its Recovery Act IDEA award for four main activities. First, officials told us that they used the funds to train 25 staff in writing transition plans for students who have individualized education programs (IEP) and working with autistic students. Therefore, officials could ensure staff members’ compliance with writing transition plans and decrease the use of nonpublic agencies for students with autism. Second, officials reported that they used the funds for special education students at eight schools by assisting them with making up course credits and implementing a literacy program called Read 180. Officials told us that they were able to decrease the number of special education students who are credit deficit in the twelfth grade and improve their reading success. Third, the officials told us that they used $577,456 of the funds to reduce contributions from the district’s general fund. They could therefore pay for nonpublic schools and agencies that provide services for students with special needs. Last, officials reported that they replaced seven older buses that serve 63 students in need of transportation per their IEP. Specifically, the buses that were replaced were 1988-1995 models that had between 250,000-399,000 miles. The buses went into service in May 2010 and have allowed San Dieguito Union High to increase the reliability of its transportation. Officials indicated that their Recovery Act IDEA award activities were more than 50 percent completed.

San Juan Unified
Carmichael, CA 95609
Award amount: $9,330,839

San Juan Unified reported that it used its Recovery Act IDEA award to focus on instruction and best practices for all administrators and teachers, from pre-K to grade 12. These funds affected 1,000 IDEA students in 50 school sites, and were used to hire two reading coaches and two behavior specialists. Additionally, 100 teachers, 30 psychologists, and 20 administrators participated in intensive behavior training. Specifically, the funds were used to implement an intensive reading intervention for IDEA students, train staff to build positive behavior interventions, replace and upgrade older computers for 11 psychologists and five other special education managers, and establish a preschool special education class equipped with preschool furniture and playground equipment for students with disabilities. As a result of these IDEA funds, officials reported that the district was able to develop reading skills for IDEA students, implement positive behavior interventions in schools and dramatically reduced school suspensions in some schools, and improve preschool programs. They indicated that their Recovery Act IDEA award activities were less than 50 percent completed.

Budget gaffe could mean big cut to special needs students

August 18th, 2010

BY MICHAEL GARDNER, UNION-TRIBUNE

ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED AUGUST 16, 2010 AT 4:14 P.M., UPDATED AUGUST 16, 2010 AT 5:56 P.M.

SACRAMENTO — A state budget glitch could cost special needs students in San Diego County $17 million.

To make matters worse, the California Department of Education is saying that some of the money already spent by districts may have to be returned unless emergency fix-it legislation is signed into law.

To head off that possibility, the state Senate in the coming days is expected to approve such a measure carried by Assemblyman Marty Block, D-San Diego.

It was a terrible oversight,” Block said. “If we don’t get the bill, millions of dollars will have to go back. School districts will have to lay off teachers, other employees and cut services.”

The problem is the Department of Education cannot allocate dollars to school districts for what’s called the “special disabilities adjustment” until a statute is passed as part of the budget act. Due to an oversight, that statute to authorize sending out the checks beyond an earlier sunset date was not passed as part of the 2009-10 budget. On top of that, the new state budget is long overdue.

The added outlay — worth $70 million statewide and $17 million to districts within San Diego County — helps schools with larger than average numbers of students with autism, brain injuries and other severe disabilities.

Forty percent of special education students in the San Diego Unified School District fall into this category.

A key selling point of the bill: San Diego is one of the two ports in the nation where the U.S. Navy specifically stations families with an autistic child because of support services, Block said.

Examples of the dollars at stake locally, Block said, include: San Diego Unified, $9 million; Sweetwater Union High School District, $1.4 million; Grossmont Union High School District, $1.25 million; Cajon Valley Union School District, $1 million; Chula Vista Elementary, $950,000; and La Mesa-Spring Valley, $700,000.

Gov Arnold Schwarzenegger has not taken a position.

IDEA Excerpts From: Investing Wisely and Quickly Use of ARRA Funds in America’s Great City Schools

May 26th, 2010

Fresno

Fresno Unified School District is using federal stimulus funds, along with instituting a hiring and purchasing freeze, to balance its 2010-11 budget and avoid layoffs. The district will use its $34.9 million State Fiscal Stabilization Fund grant to finance deferred maintenance projects in the district. IDEA and Title I funding will be used to create and retain jobs: 305 positions through IDEA and, to date, 60 positions through Title I. Title I funding has been allocated for hiring and retaining librarians, library technicians, health assistants, and nurses. IDEA funding will be used to reduce the local contribution to special education costs in 2009-10. Other special education initiatives will be undertaken once agreed to by the school board in October. The district anticipates that additional jobs will be created after these initiatives are approved.

Long Beach

Long Beach Unified School District plans to use its State Fiscal Stabilization Fund allocation to retain educators and keep class sizes at a manageable level.

In addition, the Head Start and Early Head Start programs will use a $1.1 million grant through ARRA to purchase classroom equipment; buy instructional materials to support its language and literacy component and its early math and early science efforts; and improve the physical learning environment with the acquisition of furnishings, such as new area rugs, tables, chairs, and cubbies. The grant also provides for professional development and training for teachers and a one-time cost-of -living adjustment.

The district will also receive a $524,994 equipment assistance grant funded through ARRA. The money will be used primarily to replace aging freezer and refrigeration equipment at up to 55 schools.

Los Angeles

Los Angeles Unified School District plans to use ARRA stimulus funding primarily to reduce the district’s budget deficit and to prevent layoffs. The district anticipates saving 4,621 jobs using stimulus dollars. However, this assistance still will not cover the district’s three-year deficit.

More than 80 percent of the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund dollars will be devoted to saving approximately 2,600 jobs. Using the stimulus support, the district has been able to maintain K-3 class size reduction (24:1 vs. 29:1) and preserve the positions of school police officers and elementary art and music teachers. The district also plans to support after-school programs and avoid further increases in the sizes of secondary school classes, while retaining the positions of clerical support workers, custodians, and counselors. The district also plans to uphold class-size standards at 27:1 for continuation and independent studies, campus aides, and the nursing program.

Los Angeles Unified School District will also allocate a significant portion of its IDEA funding to avoid further staff reduction (estimated at 333 jobs). The district hopes to use half of the funding to save jobs and the other half for one-time special education programs. It also will support professional development for teachers in differentiated instruction, specialized training related to autism support, a prevention program for grades K-2, accessible classroom-assistive technology, specialized training, salaries of paraeducators, and technology infrastructure.

Lastly, the superintendent plans to allocate as much ARRA Title I funding as possible (more than 60 percent) to go back to the schools, and is encouraging district schools to use the dollars to stabilize their schools by adding positions. This action will promote choice and better align with federal guidelines.

San Diego

San Diego Unified School District will use stimulus funding to help replace money lost through enormous state budget cuts. The district and school board are currently considering the most effective way to use Title I stimulus funds, and may direct some funding to an existing class-size reduction program that has suffered due to the recession.

San Diego’s was the first school district in the nation to utilize the interest-free Qualified School Construction Bonds (QSCBs) available under the federal stimulus package (according to the finance newspaper, The Bond Buyer). The district had plans for a school facility improvement program in place before ARRA was enacted, as well as prior bond authorization approval from the voters. This unique situation allowed the San Diego schools to take advantage of the federal bonding authority quickly, for the exact purpose that the stimulus measure intended: to provide fiscal relief to the district and create jobs in the community.

The district’s allocation of $38.8 billion in QSCBs under ARRA was included as part of San Diego’s larger capital improvement program, and will be used for repairing outdated student restrooms and deteriorated plumbing and roofs, as well as for upgrading career and vocational classrooms and labs. In addition, the funding will be used to provide up-to-date classroom technology; improve school safety and security and upgrade fire alarms; replace dilapidated portable classrooms; and remove hazardous substances. The district will realize savings of approximately $20 million as a result of the federal bonding authority, and will use the funds to make technology investments that would otherwise have been delayed until money was available.

San Diego Unified School District also received $160,000 in stimulus funds from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency to continue the district’s efforts to “clean up” its fleet of school buses. Since 1999, 519 buses have been retrofitted with new diesel technology (10 using ARRA funds) and the district is now using only seven buses without the “green” technology. Students in the district’s automotive technology program are receiving training that will prepare them for “green” careers in diesel technology.

San Francisco

San Francisco Unified School District lost $57 million in state aid, and most of the federal stimulus funding will be used to sustain the reforms that the district has been working to implement. Stimulus funding will also be used for teacher professional development, educational technology, and in ensuring that students have the supports that they need to graduate and attend college. The district set up a Web page to gather comments from the public about how the stimulus money could be used.

The district is using State Fiscal Stabilization Funds (SFSFs) primarily to offset cuts made by the State of California to revenue limit/state aid and state categorical programs. This stimulus funding will allow San Francisco to maintain programs that serve the highest-need students and avoid layoffs of certificated staff in the 2009-10 school year. As a result of SFSFs, the district will be able to maintain several key programs, including summer school programs for students at risk of being retained or failing the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE). Stabilization funds will also support critical intervention and targeted instructional services—such as those provided by instructional reform facilitators, school advisors, parent-community liaisons, middle and high school counselors—to schools with the highest concentration of economically disadvantaged and at-risk of failing students. Strategic professional development for new teachers will also be supported with SFSFs.

More than half of the Title I funding under ARRA will be used to support instructional reform facilitators, who will serve as teachers on special assignment at program improvement school sites. Approximately one-fourth of the funds will focus on parent and community liaisons, who support family services at program improvement school sites. Remaining funding will be used to provide summer school at program improvement sites; to create an academic warehouse and reporting system: and to buttress school choice transportation and indirect funding.

The district’s IDEA stimulus funds will be used in 2009-10 to provide increased services to special needs students through non-public schools and non-public agencies.

For the full report Click Here.

Valley schools get $10 million for special ed

May 24th, 2010

MICHELLE MITCHELLTHE DESERT SUN • MAY 23, 2010

Among the beneficiaries of the $787 billion in federal stimulus funds is special education.

More than $10 million sent to the Coachella Valley’s three school districts are designated as Individuals with Disabilities Education Act funding.

School districts already are required to provide a certain level of service for students with disabilities, even though the cost to do that is higher than the special education funding districts receive from state and federal governments.

Districts were allowed to use up to half of the stimulus funding to help cover the special education costs that rise above what they are funded for — something all three districts took advantage of.

About 60 percent of districts statewide did the same, according to the state Legislative Analyst’s Office survey. But because special education services already are mandated, the extra funding helped districts provide additional services and training instead of just staving off cuts to the program.

“The stimulus funds really did provide enhancement,” said Laura Fisher, director of pupil services and special education for Coachella Valley Unified.

Fisher’s district used the IDEA stimulus money to fund 11 instructional aides in the classroom as well as additional training and equipment, she said.

Desert Sands Unified purchased assistive technology and computers and software to provide extra help to students with disabilities.

Maria Moore, special education teacher at Ronald Reagan Elementary School in Palm Desert, received two computers with headphones and software for her preschool students — and it’s been a hit with students and parents.

“Because it’s visual and my kids are so visual, it’s definitely something they love to do,” she said. “When they’re on it, they’re on it. They’re not misbehaving.”

The computer program both supplements the work that students are doing in the classroom and can provide printouts for parents and Moore to see where students need extra help.

Moore said she hasn’t had the computer and software long enough to determine how much it can really help her class of students with mild to moderate disabilities, but the computers aren’t going anywhere — a long-term impact of short-term stimulus funding.

The special education funding also indirectly helped limit cuts in other areas. For example, a district could cover $2 million of the extra cost of special education with stimulus dollars rather than the general fund.

So while the IDEA stimulus money technically funds special education, it also frees up dollars for other teaching jobs or costs.

RECOVERY ACT California’s Use of Funds and Efforts to Ensure Accountability

March 8th, 2010
Excerpts from the GAO Report on California:
California Primarily Used Recovery Act Education Funds to Retain Jobs and Is Working to Address Its Cash Management Issues:

As of February 19, 2010, California disbursed approximately $4.7 billion in Recovery Act education funds for three programs—SFSF; ESEA Title I, Part A, as amended; and IDEA, Part B. These funds were allocated to local educational agencies (LEA), special education local plan areas, and institutions of higher education (IHE). Specifically, California was allocated $5.47 billion in SFSF funds to help state and local governments stabilize their budgets by minimizing budgetary cuts in education and other government services. Under the Recovery Act, states must allocate 81.8 percent of their SFSF to support education (education stabilization funds), and the remaining 18.2 percent must be used for public safety and other government services, which may include education programs. California has received about $1.1 billion in SFSF government services funds that it used for payroll costs for its corrections system and has received about $4 billion in SFSF education stabilization funds. California also received approximately $464 million in Recovery Act ESEA Title I, Part A funding, which supports education for disadvantaged students and about $286 million in IDEA funding, which supports special education efforts.
LEAs Are Primarily Using Recovery Act Funds to Retain Jobs but Still Anticipate Job Losses:

The majority of LEAs in California said they anticipate using more than half of their Recovery Act funds to retain jobs. As of December 31, 2009, the California Department of Education (CDE) reported that LEAs in the state funded a total of nearly 50,000 education jobs—mostly teachers—with the three Recovery Act education funding programs in our review, with approximately 39,000 of those jobs funded by SFSF.24 In the Los Angeles Unified School District (LA Unified), according to district officials, almost 6,400 jobs were funded by the three Recovery Act programs. LA Unified officials said that, without the Recovery Act funds, teacher layoffs could have caused increased class size, with a resulting loss of individual attention to each student. Yet, even with SFSF funds, an estimated 50 percent of the California LEAs reported that they expect job losses. Recently, officials from two large California LEAs told us that their districts anticipate teacher and other staff layoffs for the next school year to address budget shortfalls. According to a senior LA Unified official, the district may face teacher and support staff cuts of 7,000 to 8,000 to balance its budget for the 2010-2011 school year.
While LEAs are using a large portion of their Recovery Act funds for jobs, LEAs we met with told us they also planned to use funds for other eligible activities, such as purchasing textbooks and funding deferred facility maintenance, among other program uses. We visited two LEAs in California—the Los Angeles Unified School District and Alvina Elementary Charter School in Fresno County—to find out more about how they are spending Recovery Act funds, see table 2 for a description of these uses.
*Chart on page 22 of Report
LEAs also awarded contracts for services and materials using Recovery Act funds. Although including provisions related to the Recovery Act is not a requirement under the act, LEA officials we met with stated that including Recovery Act provisions in contracts could have been useful in helping vendors understand Recovery Act requirements, including reporting requirements. However, none of the contracts we reviewed included provisions related to Recovery Act requirements. We met with seven LEAs that awarded contracts using either SFSF or ESEA Title I Recovery Act funds, or both, for services, such as tutoring, professional development for teachers, for special programs for students, and for equipment. According to LEA officials and our review of contracts, contract terms did not include specific Recovery Act requirements, such as wage rate requirements, whistle blower protection, and reporting requirements. LEA officials stated that they neither received guidance from CDE regarding the administration of Recovery Act contracts, nor were they aware of Recovery Act specific contract terms and conditions. Two of the LEAs we met with told us that they plan to include Recovery Act terms and conditions in future contracts.
California Has Taken Initial Steps to Resolve Its Ongoing Cash Management Issues:

Our prior reports highlighted concerns related to CDE’s and LEAs’ ESEA Title I, Part A, cash management practices—specifically CDE’s early drawdown of ESEA Title I Recovery Act funding and the release of $450 million (80 percent) of the funds to LEAs on May 28, 2009. According to CDE officials, the drawdown was in lieu of its normally scheduled drawdown of school year 2008-2009 ESEA Title I funds and, therefore, the schools would be ready to use the funds quickly. However, in August 2009, we contacted the 10 LEAs in California that had received the largest amounts of ESEA Title I, Part A Recovery Act funds and found that 7 had not spent any of these funds and that all 10 reported large cash balances—ranging from $4.5 million to about $140.5 million. This raised issues about the state’s compliance with applicable cash management requirements. In response to cash management concerns,25 CDE implemented a pilot program to help monitor LEA compliance with federal cash management requirements. The program uses a Web-based quarterly reporting process to track LEA cash balances. Currently, the pilot program collects cash balance information from LEAs that receive funds under one relatively small non-Recovery Act program. CDE officials told us that they plan to expand the pilot to include regular and Recovery Act ESEA Title I, Part A, and SFSF by October 2010. CDE has collected data from LEAs for two quarters and has conducted an analysis to compare drawdown amounts from prior fiscal years. However, CDE has not yet established performance goals for the pilot program or developed a program evaluation plan.
We also raised concerns about the inconsistent interest calculation and payment remittance processes at LEAs in California. CDE has since developed an interest calculation methodology and, on January 25, 2010, provided guidance to all LEAs on calculating and remitting interest on federal cash balances. CDE officials also told us that they plan to monitor LEA remittance of interest from Recovery Act funded programs by reviewing expenditure data LEAs submit in their quarterly recipient reports and verifying that the LEA remitted appropriate interest amounts. However, CDE has not yet developed mechanisms to help ensure LEAs are using sound interest calculation methods and promptly remitting interest earned on federal cash advances for non-Recovery Act funded programs. We plan to continue following this cash management issue in our ongoing bimonthly work.
Read the full Report here: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10467t.pdf